Light ROM 4/Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso/text/maillist/1995/1095.doc/000431_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sun Oct 8 20:15:46 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA298778546; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 20:15:46 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from sol (sol.racsa.co.cr) by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA298718535; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 20:15:35 -0700
Received: by sol (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
    id AA09374; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 21:05:20 +0600
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 1995 21:05:20 +0600 (GMT)
From: Thomas Desmond <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: video seq.s w/PAR-TBCIV
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.90.951008210207.9132A-100000@sol>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 799
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

I'm using a PAR card w/ TBCIV to digitize video takes.
Captured image quality is less than superb, which I suppose
is the result of image compression.  I find that
with the Block Limit set at 176, the highest Q-Factor I
can set is between 8 and 12.  The dedicated hard disk
hooked up to the PAR is a Seagate 3600a, which is one of
the very first hard drives that was approved for the PAR.

I know that the newer disks that DPS has approved
for use with the PAR can record and play back
images with less compression than the disk I
have now, but I don't have any idea of how
much better the resulting image quality would
be.  I'd like to ask anybody who has
upgraded their PAR hard disk if they got a
noticable improvement in the image quality
of their digitized video takes.  Thanks

Tom Desmond


--
Thomas Desmond <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]